The protection packages from Bitdefender and Avira slowed the system down slightly, and for this they received a small point reduction: 5.5 points each.Īmong the corporate solutions, ESET, Sophos and Symantec earned the full 6 points, as they placed no measurable load on the system. In fact, the packages from Avast, Intego, NortonLifeLock, Trend Micro and F-Secure achieved the full 6 points. There were hardly any anomalies among the packages for private users in the current test. The lab then repeats all the tasks with an installed protection solution. The testers clock the times required as a reference value. The test uses a reference Mac and performs a variety of tasks on it, such as copying files, downloads, launching programs or installing apps. In the test category of performance, the lab tests the level of resources the protection packages require and thus the load placed on the Mac. The product from Sophos committed a miniscule error: 99.9 percent. The solutions from Bitdefender, ESET, FireEye and Symantec detected the attackers 100 percent. The packages for endpoints in a corporate environment can ferret out the digital attackers even more effectively. The packages from Avira and F-Secure followed close behind at 99.8 percent detection each. Managing to complete the test error-free and with 100 percent detection were Avast, Bitdefender, Intego, NortonLifeLock and Trend Micro. First the products for consumers were evaluated. The digital malware samples are mostly brand-new. In the area of protection, the lab examines the capability of detecting malware. This was followed by Bitdefender with 17.5 points and FireEye with 17 points. There was a similar positive outcome in the findings involving corporate solutions: ESET, Sophos and Symantec reached the full 18 points. Coming in next were Bitdefender and F-Secure with 17.5 points Avira received still a very good score of 17 points. The test results: among the 7 consumer protection packages evaluated, the lab awarded the full 18 points to the products from Avast, Intego, NortonLifeLock and Trend Micro. To mark their achievements, the lab issues consumer products the certificate of AV-TEST CERTIFIED, and solutions for corporate users the certificate of AV-TEST APPROVED. AV-TEST also awards a security certificate for a successful security test. Thus, the top score in the test is 18 points. For each category, the laboratory can award up to 6 points.
The solutions for Mac enterprise endpoints came from Bitdefender, ESET, FireEye, Sophos and Symantec.Īll protection packages and solutions were vetted in terms of their protection, performance and usability. The MacOS Big Sur was used as a test platform, and the consumer protection packages were from Avast, Avira, Bitdefender, F-Secure, Intego, NortonLifeLock and Trend Micro. The lab examined 7 security packages for consumers and 5 solutions for Mac endpoints in a corporate environment. 12 security packages for consumer and corporate users
In the meantime, Apple has released an update that closes the dangerous vulnerability. Those who had additional protection on board were lucky. But not every user was willing or able to do so. Apple immediately recommended users to update their systems to the new MacOS Big Sur. It is actually supposed to check applications in terms of their certification, filtering out trojans, viruses and other malware. But back to reality: as recently as April of this year, Apple was forced to acknowledge that there was a zero-day vulnerability enabling Mac's Gatekeeper security features to be circumvented. doc.exe will be more obvious, and always think before opening an attachment.Yet many Mac users unfortunately still believe their Apple system is invulnerable, thus a protection solution is not for them. If you need to get email attachments or files from colleagues, always show file extensions so a.
Don’t add software unless you really need it, get games from their official seller. In conclusion, unless you are a high risk user I think you will be much happier with Defender. With third party antivirus, browsers not working or updates causing problems I think is much more common.
And Defender almost never leads to a computer that won’t boot or connect to internet after a Microsoft or other update. Opening Chrome on computers with third party antivirus software I have seen take several seconds. The amount it reduces performance feels not too heavy, especially when large programs like a browser or an office suite are loading. The advantage I see of Microsoft Defender is that it almost never blocks a browser or updated version of a browser from working, nor other software like games. Lately I only see this on people at high risk meaning those who use software from random sources, or users of email attachments. Years ago I saw a lot of people get viruses on computers.